Infliximab for vascular involvement in Behçet's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular involvement is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Behçet's syndrome (BS). We aimed to survey the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) in BS patients with vascular involvement followed in a dedicated tertiary center. METHODS: Charts of all BS patients who used IFX for vascular involvement between 2004 and 2022 were reviewed. Primary endpoint was remission at Month 6, defined as lack of new clinical symptoms and findings associated with vascular lesion, lack of worsening of the primary vascular lesion and a new vascular lesion on imaging, and CRP < 10 mg/L. Relapse was defined as development of a new vascular lesion or recurrence of the preexisting vascular lesion. RESULTS: Among the 127 patients (102 men, mean age at IFX initiation: 35.8 ± 9.0 years) treated with IFX, 110 (87%) had received IFX for remission induction and 87 of these (79%) were already on immunosuppressives when the vascular lesion requiring IFX developed. The remission rate was 73% (93/127) at Month 6 and 63% (80/127) at Month 12. Seventeen patients experienced relapses. Remission rates were better among patients with pulmonary artery involvement and venous thrombosis compared to patients with non-pulmonary artery involvement and venous ulcers. Fourteen patients had adverse events leading to IFX discontinuation and 4 had died due to lung adenocarcinoma, sepsis, and pulmonary hypertension-related right heart failure due to pulmonary artery thrombosis (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Infliximab seems to be effective in majority of BS patients with vascular involvement, even in those who are refractory to immunosuppressives and glucocorticoids.

Emergence of new manifestations during infliximab treatment in Behçet's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Infliximab (IFX) is increasingly being used for the treatment of severe manifestations of Behçet's syndrome (BS). However, emergence of new manifestations has also been occasionally reported during IFX treatment. We aimed to assess the frequency of new manifestations in our BS patients treated with IFX. METHODS: A chart review was conducted to identify all BS patients treated with IFX in our clinic between 2004 and 2020. Demographic data, indications for IFX initiation, concomitant treatments and outcomes were recorded. A new manifestation was defined as the emergence of a new organ involvement or mucocutaneous manifestation developing for the first time during IFX treatment or within 12 weeks after the last infusion of IFX. RESULTS: Among our 282 patients who used IFX, 19 (7%) patients had developed a total of 23 new manifestations during a mean follow-up of 20.0 (15.3) months. Patients with vascular involvement were more likely to develop a new manifestation (12/19, 63%). Initial manifestations that required IFX were in remission at the time of new manifestation in 14/19 patients. IFX treatment was intensified (n = 6) and/or glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives or colchicine was added to IFX (n = 21). IFX was switched to another agent for the remaining manifestations (n = 8). These treatment modifications led to remission in 17/19 patients. CONCLUSION: New manifestations developed during IFX treatment in 7% of our patients with BS. They could be managed by intensifying IFX treatment or adding other agents in the majority of these manifestations.